Case studyInterface
PET-CT Second Read · interface

The hardest engineering problem was the upload, not the reporting.

A 400MB DICOM study, over an unstable mobile connection, from someone who has never used a medical portal, at two in the morning, in a different time zone, with no technical support available. Everything about that sentence is hostile to a normal file upload — and none of the work it took shows up in a screenshot.

Video1600×900 CC · VTT REQUIRED 04:38

What a second read actually changes

Dr. Ishita B. Sen walks through an anonymised study — what she looks at first, what would change management, and when she would decline to report.

1600×900 · 16:9
MP4 H.264 · ≤22MB
POSTER 1600×900 WEBP
#vid-second-read-walkthrough

Screens are indicative. Patient-identifiable material never appears in marketing assets; the gallery uses de-identified demonstration data only.

Building something patient-facing?

The audit covers the interface as well as the index — including whether a frightened reader can tell in five seconds that the page applies to them.

Request an audit